Legal Opinion

Milman v. Denniston

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1947PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.

Defendant moves for an order, pursuant to section 123 of the Civil Practice Act, canceling and discharging of record the lis pendens filed by the plaintiff herein, “ upon the ground that the complaint was dismissed for failure to state *211a cause of action.” The plaintiff cross moves for an order “ resettling the judgment entered herein on September 3rd, 194 G by adding thereto a decretal provision expressly dismissing the complaint herein, so as to correct the defect in form of said judgment which has barred a review thereof by the Court of Appeals.”

On July 1, 1946, plaintiff commenced this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Herpe v. . HerpeNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Mills v. . BlissNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Interboro Operating Corp. v. Commonwealth Security & Mortgage Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. Beman v. . ToddNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. S. J. E. Building Corp. v. Matt O. M. Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Whittemore v. De PasqualeNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Milman v. DennistonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API