Legal Opinion

Garwood v. Port Arrowhead Marina, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 29, 1999No. 22656PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNETH W. SHRUM, Judge.

Port Arrowhead Marina, Inc., (“Marina”) and Galva-Foam Marine Industries (“Galva-Foam”) appeal from the trial court’s order denying their “Motion to Stay Proceedings and' Compel Arbitration” pursuant to § 435.440.1 Respondents request that we dismiss the appeal. They argue the order does not constitute an appealable final judgment because it does not dispose of all parties and all claims and does not contain an express finding that “there is no just reason for delay” as required by Rule 74.01(b).2 We agree. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal without prejudice.

In…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Greenwood v. SherfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Transit Casualty Co. in Receivership v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Madden v. EllspermannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Abrams v. Four Seasons Lakesites/Chase Resorts, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. MLJ Investments, Inc. v. ReidMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jackson County v. McClain Enterprises, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Precision Investments, L.L.C. v. Cornerstone Propane, L.P.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Dunn v. Security Financial Advisors, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API