Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Watson v. Crandall

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 20, 1879PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHayden, J.

In addition to the facts stated in the opinion delivered in the case of Hornblower against these defendants, it should *234here be said that on July 1, 1871, Hornblower received from Crandall eight certificates, of one hundred shares each, representing the stock in the Pioneer Mining and Smelting Company for which the drafts were sent' by Hornblower. When Watson, Reed, and Baker purchased, their names were inserted in blanks in certificates corresponding to their respective numbers of shares, and the company was advised accordingly. The referee finds that all of the representations made by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ball v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Bruff v. . MaliNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  3. Cazeaux v. MaliNew York Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Shotwell v. MaliNew York Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Seizer v. MaliNew York Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wilson v. MurchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Richey v. PhilippMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Baker's Adm'r v. CrandallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  5. Watson v. CrandallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API