Legal Opinion

Castle v. Searles

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 14, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dady

This was an automobile accident case tried on a complaint and counterclaim. The jury found the defendant not guilty on the complaint and found the counter defendant guilty on the counterclaim and allowed counter-claimant $5,100 as damages. The trial judge required a remittitur of $1,100 and on such remittitur being made entered judgment for $4,000 on the verdict.

Stanly Castle was plaintiff and counter defendant. His wife, Elsie Castle, was a coplaintiff. These two were the only occupants of the Castle car. Eugene Searles was defendant and counterclaimant. He and his father were the only…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Illinois Iron & Metal Co. v. WeberIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Cullen v. HigginsIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Chicago City Railway Co. v. SchaeferAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905
  4. City of Chicago v. ColmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. York v. El-GanzouriAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  2. Estate of Whittington v. Emdeko National Housewares, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. People v. DebeaulieuMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  4. York v. El-GanzouriAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API