Legal Opinion
Amoco Transport Co. v. Dietze, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 22, 1984No. 83 Civ. 4896 (GLG)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOETTEL, District Judge:
On June 28, 1983, plaintiff Amoco Transport Company (“Amoco”) commenced this action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1335 (1976), by interpleading Dietze, Inc. (“Dietze”), The Royal Bank of Canada (“RBC”), and the various defendants who are a part of the Cast shipping group. Amoco’s objective was, and is, to obtain a clear determination of who is entitled to payment of $470,728.84 in freight charges that Amoco incurred in May of last year. Rather than pay that amount into court, Amoco chose to post a bond, as allowed under section 1335(a)(2). By taking this step, Amoco…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Griffin v. McCoachSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Bank of China v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Arbitration Between Westchester Fire Insurance v. Massamont Insurance Agency, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Fidelity Bank v. Commonwealth Marine & General Assurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Irving R. Boody & Co. v. Win Holdings International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Orshan v. MacchiarolaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
- General Railway Signal Co. v. CorcoranDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.