Legal Opinion

Butler v. Selectmen of Wakefield

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 2, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtField, J.

This is a petition, brought by a citizen and taxpayer of the town of Wakefield against the selectmen of that town, for a writ of prohibition to restrain them from entering into an agreement with the Heywood-Wakefield *586Company in accordance with a vote of the town. It sets forth in Ml St. 1906, c. 249, which authorizes the town “for the purposes of surface and ground drainage and for the protection of the public health” to “improve the brooks and natural streams and water courses in said town” and to take or purchase property and enter into contracts for that purpose, and alleges the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Connecticut River Railroad v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  2. Fuller v. Trustees of Deerfield AcademyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. Dowling v. Board of AssessorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Day v. Board of AldermenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  5. Kilty v. Railroad CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dube v. Mayor of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Howe v. Town of WakeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  3. Fine v. Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard & Nantucket Steamship AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
  4. Policastro v. City of BostonMassachusetts Superior Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API