Legal Opinion

Sampsell v. Straub Et Ux

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 22, 1951No. 12676PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASTIE, Circuit' Judge.

In the voluntary bankruptcy proceeding of a husband and wife and on their petition, the district court ordered that the California residence of the bankrupts be set aside from the bankrupt estate as homestead and exempt property. The trustee in bankruptcy has appealed from-that order because the declaration of homestead, although- duly executed and acknowledged by the spouses before they filed their petition in bankruptcy, was not recorded as required to become effective under California law 1 until after bankruptcy adjudication.

Disposition of the issue thus raised must…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. White v. StumpSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Myers v. MatleySupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Gudger v. MantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Commercial Credit Co. v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  5. Coley v. HeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sampsell v. StraubCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  2. McKay v. Trusco Finance Co., of Montgomery, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  3. Arkinson v. Gitts (In Re Gitts)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Moniz v. MonizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. In Re TowersDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API