Legal Opinion

State v. Olmstead

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 18, 1989No. 88-11312; CA A50685PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals from his convictions, on stipulated facts, for driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 813.010, and driving with a suspended license. ORS 811.182. Before trial, defendant filed notice of his intent to defend both charges by asserting that he was guilty but insane. ORS 161.295. The state moved that the defense be stricken. The court granted the state’s motion.

Defendant’s only contention is that the court erred in striking the defense. The defense under ORS 161.295 is not available, because driving under the influence of intoxicants and driving with a suspended license…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ButtreyOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. MaguireCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. State v. MaguireOregon Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. OlmsteadOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. State v. OlmsteadCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. State v. OlmsteadOregon Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API