Legal Opinion

Smith v. Goethe

California Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1905No. Sac. No. 1376PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County and from an order denying a new trial. J. W. Hughes, Judge. The facts are stated .in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment in favor of the estate of Ann Thomas, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial? .The present plaintiffs are the administrators, representing the estates of Ann Thomas and Frank Thomas respectively. The action was begun by Frank Thomas in his own behalf and as administrator of the estate of Ann Thomas, then deceased. Frank Thomas died after the judgment appealed from was entered, and his successor and personal representative have been substituted as plaintiffs. Judgment was given in favor of the defendants against Frank Thomas,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wickersham v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Alaniz v. CasenaveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Raynor v. MintzerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Munson v. FishburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Young v. the Young Holdings Corp., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Sanguinetti v. RossenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  4. State v. City of SheridanWyoming Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Baird v. ConoverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API