Legal Opinion
Alaska Electrical Pension Fund v. Adecco S.A.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided March 29, 2006No. CIV. 04CV0129-M(WMC)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER: (1) GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT; (2) DISMISSING AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE
LORENZ, District Judge.
On January 30, 2006, this matter came on regularly for a hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint. Scott H. Saham of Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins, LLP appeared for Plaintiffs. Laurie B. Smilan of Latham & Watkins, LLP appeared for the Defendants.
Having carefully reviewed the parties’ briefs, oral argument, and applicable law, the Court finds the Consolidated Amended Complaint (“Amended Complaint”) does not meet the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re American Apparel, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
- In Re Hansen Natural Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
- Rieckborn v. Jefferies LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System v. Sterling Financial Corp.District Court, E.D. Washington · 2013
- Weiss v. Amkor Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.