Sharp v. State
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to the Gloucester Quarter Sessions.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Magie, J.
The .plaintiff, in .error, Sharp, was convicted in the Gloucester Sessions upon an indictment charging him-with having procured the endorsement of one Cunard upon his promissory note by false pretences and with intent to defraud.
Sharp, by this writ of error, seeks a reversal of th.e conviction, and has assigned numerous errors upon the-record and proceedings.
Two of the assignments, present such unmistakable error that it is plain that the judgment cannot stand.
In the first place, the false pretences charged in.the indictment were not proved,…
2Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Anderson v. SullivanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- State v. SamurineNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1914
- Leighton v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- State v. LamoreauxNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954