Legal Opinion

United States v. Simpkins

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided July 17, 1986No. NMCM 85 4428PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRANT, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted of one specification of stealing a Pentax camera, valued at $250.00 (Charge I) and of two separate specifications of obstructing justice (Charge II), in violation of, respectively, Articles 121 and 134, Uni*925form Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) 10 U.S.C. §§ 921, 934. He was sentenced to confinement for five months, reduction to pay grade E-l, and a bad-conduct discharge. The convening authority disapproved confinement in excess of 114 days, but otherwise approved the remainder of the sentence as adjudged. We will consider the errors…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. MayoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. Lorenzo Raphael Hernandez and Ana HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. SolowDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  5. Joe Elmer Collins v. United States of America, William Ross Sperry v. United States of America, George D. Poulos v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. AsfeldU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
  2. United States v. BaileyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
  3. United States v. LatimerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API