United States v. Simpkins
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
GRANT, Judge:
Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted of one specification of stealing a Pentax camera, valued at $250.00 (Charge I) and of two separate specifications of obstructing justice (Charge II), in violation of, respectively, Articles 121 and 134, Uni*925form Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) 10 U.S.C. §§ 921, 934. He was sentenced to confinement for five months, reduction to pay grade E-l, and a bad-conduct discharge. The convening authority disapproved confinement in excess of 114 days, but otherwise approved the remainder of the sentence as adjudged. We will consider the errors…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. MayoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. Lorenzo Raphael Hernandez and Ana HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- United States v. SolowDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Joe Elmer Collins v. United States of America, William Ross Sperry v. United States of America, George D. Poulos v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. AsfeldU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. BaileyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
- United States v. LatimerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990