Legal Opinion · Dissent

North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Warren

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 5, 1990No. 307PA89Published

1DissentJustice Martin

Believing as I do that the majority has failed to properly interpret and apply the policy exclusion under consideration, I respectfully dissent.

At the outset it is settled law in this jurisdiction that exclusions contained in liability policies of insurance are to be construed against the insurer. Grant v. Insurance Co., 295 N.C. 39, 243 S.E.2d 894 (1978). This Court has adopted a two-prong test to determine whether a non-owned vehicle is furnished to the insured for his or her “regular use” and is thereby excluded from coverage under the policy provision in question. In Whaley v. Insurance…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Grant v. Emmco InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Central Security Mutual Insurance v. DePintoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. Travelers Indemnity Company v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  4. Whaley v. Great American Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Devine v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API