Legal Opinion

Speed v. Stotts

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided September 30, 1996No. 93-3525-KHVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VRATIL, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment, which is contained in their Answer (Doc. # 22) filed September 15,1994. 1 Plaintiff, an inmate at El Dorado Correctional Facility (“EDCF”), brings this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that defendants violated his constitutional rights in connection with his confinement in administrative -segregation at EDCF and at Lansing Correctional Facility (“LCF”). Specifically, plaintiff claims that defendants segregated him from the general…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API