Legal Opinion

(PC) Gosztyla v. Auld

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 5, 2025No. 2:22-cv-01276Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD GOSZTYLA, No. 2:22-cv-01276-KJM-EFB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 AULD, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 6, 2024, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a), the court determined that 19 plaintiff’s second amended complaint1 (SAC) alleged potentially cognizable Eighth Amendment 20 and Fourteenth Amendment claims against defendants Auld (a supervising registered nurse),…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API