Robinson v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.
Although every unauthorized use not amounting to an Unauthorized Use may not establish the element of a trespassory taking, hearsay (even twice compounded) may. Thus the conviction of the appellant, Edward J. Robinson, in a non-jury trial in the Criminal Court of Baltimore, for the Unauthorized Use of an Automobile in violation of Article 27, § 349, will be sustained for one reason, if not for another. The appellant, also convicted of receiving stolen goods and of possession of a deadly weapon, here appeals all three convictions. We will consider first the conviction for the Unauthorized Use…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- People v. . GalboNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Metz v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Brewer v. MeleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Barnes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- State v. FunkhouserCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Ross v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- In re Lakeysha P.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Burns v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.