Legal Opinion

Robinson v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 6, 1973No. 386, September Term, 1972PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.

Although every unauthorized use not amounting to an Unauthorized Use may not establish the element of a trespassory taking, hearsay (even twice compounded) may. Thus the conviction of the appellant, Edward J. Robinson, in a non-jury trial in the Criminal Court of Baltimore, for the Unauthorized Use of an Automobile in violation of Article 27, § 349, will be sustained for one reason, if not for another. The appellant, also convicted of receiving stolen goods and of possession of a deadly weapon, here appeals all three convictions. We will consider first the conviction for the Unauthorized Use…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  3. People v. . GalboNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Metz v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  5. Brewer v. MeleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Barnes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. State v. FunkhouserCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Ross v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. In re Lakeysha P.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Burns v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API