Jackson v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
WALSH, Justice:
In this appeal from the Superior Court, we are required to determine when the three year period for the filing of a motion for postconviction relief under Superi- or Court Criminal Rule 61 begins to run. The Superior Court determined that the appellant, Richard K. Jackson’s, (“Jackson”) motion was untimely because it was filed more than three years after his sentencing, but within three years from the date his conviction had been affirmed on appeal. Although there has been some inconsistency in previous rulings of this Court which have inferentially addressed the issue, we now…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dawson v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Flamer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- Dawson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- Spielberg v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- Dawson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Maxion v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- Guy v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Hopkins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Tatem v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.