Legal Opinion

Lerch Bros. v. McKinne Bros.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The judge is authorized, upon such terms as may be just, to relieve a party at any time within one year after notice from a judgment taken against him through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect (C. S., 600), but the several grounds upon which the power may .be exercised relate to facts and do not extend to matters of law. Ignorantia facti excusat, ignorantia juris non éxcusat. Ignorance of a material fact may excuse a party, but ignorance of the law does not excuse him from the legal consequences of his conduct. In Skinner v. Terry, 107 N. C., 103, the Court, holding…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Skinner v. . TerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Phifer v. Travellers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. Churchill v. Brooklyn Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  4. Howell v. . BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crissman v. . PalmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Rierson v. . YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  3. Milton M. Croom Charitable Remainder Unitrust v. HedrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. Elramy v. . AbeyounisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Endsley v. Wolfe Camera Supply Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API