Legal Opinion
Salcedo v. Evanston Insurance
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided June 24, 2011No. 2:10-mj-00363PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KATHLEEN CARDONE, District Judge.
On this date, the Court considered “Plaintiffs First Amended Motion for Summary Judgment” (“Plaintiffs Motion”), ECF No. 19, and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Defendant’s Motion”), ECF No. 22. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs Motion is DENIED and Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND
The following facts are undisputed.
In February 2008, Villegas & Sons (“Villegas”) was operating an asphalt plant. Pl.’s Proposed Undisputed Facts (“Facts”) ¶ 11, ECF No. 28; Pl.’s Mot. Ex. B (“Final Judgment”), at 1, ECF No. 19-2. The asphalt plant…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hartford Casualty Insurance v. EwanDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2012
- Markel Insurance Company v. 2 RJP Ventures, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2020