Legal Opinion
Better Packages, Inc. v. Nashua Package Sealing Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 11, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
The motion is in all respects granted.
I. The plaintiff did not avail itself of its right to appeal on or before November 2, 1932, from such part of the interlocutory decree of October 3, 1932, entered in the ease decided by Judge Coleman of Better Packages, Inc., v. L. Link & Co., et al. (D. C.) 1 F. Supp. 132, as held invalid certain claims of patents No. 1,194,752 and No. 1,782,123.
I think that under the principles taught in the opinion of the Supreme Court in Ensten v. Simon, Ascher & Co., 282 U. S. 445, 455, 51 S. Ct. 207, 75 L. Ed. 453, illustrated by such…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ensten v. Simon, Ascher & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Otis Elevator Co. v. Pacific Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- R. Hoe & Co. v. Goss Printing Press Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Radio Condenser Co. v. General Instrument CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Better Packages, Inc. v. L. Link & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1932
3Cited by3 opinions
- General Chemical Co. v. Standard Wholesale Phosphate & Acid Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- General Chemical Co. v. Standard Wholesale Phosphate & Acid Works, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1934
- Rolscreen Co. v. Abraham & Straus, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1938