Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fredericks v. General Motors Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 26, 1973No. Docket 14178Published

1DissentChurchill, J.

I respectfully dissent.

An understanding of the issue requires an understanding of the interrelated functions of power presses and diesets. Power presses. vary in complexity and design, but they have two basic parts, a bed and a ram. Dies are especially made to produce shaped manufactured parts. A dieset for a power press has two basic parts, an upper die and a lower die, which in use are attached to the ram and bed of the press. The workpiece, which is positioned between the two dies, is reformed into a desired shape when the ram, with the upper die attached, presses the workpiece against the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Byrnes v. Economic MacHinery Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Inglis v. Millersburg Driving Ass'n.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Hill v. Clark Equipment Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Lapasinskas v. QuickMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Mulcahy v. Argo Steel Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API