Jackson v. Moultrie Production Credit Ass'n

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The claimant contends that the verdict, finding the property subject to the levy, is without evidence to support it, and that the judge erred in overruling the general grounds of the motion for a new trial. It is the contention of the plaintiff that the evidence authorized the jury to find that the title to the tractor was in Paul Jackson, or that the claimant was estopped by his conduct from claiming the tractor.

The jury was authorized to find from the evidence that the claimant purchased the tractor and turned it over to his son for his son to use, and…