Legal Opinion

Humble v. German Alliance Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 10, 1914No. 18,534PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Cherokee district court; Edward E. Sapp, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

When this case was here before (Humble v. Insurance Co., 85 Kan. 140, 116 Pac. 472) it was held that the policy was not avoided by additional in*308surance taken out by another without the knowledge, consent or ratification of the insured, and that a provision prohibiting- incumbrance does not invalidate a policy issued on oral application when no inquiries or statements are made regarding incumbrances and there is no concealment or misleading conduct on the part of the insured. The company appeals from a judgment resulting from a retrial. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. AyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  2. Humble v. German Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Miner v. VedderMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Akers v. Farmers Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  2. Murphey v. Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Twin City Fire Ins. Co. v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Phoenix Indemnity Co. v. ZinnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  5. Nowak v. City of New York InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API