Legal Opinion

Humble v. German Alliance Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 10, 1911No. 17,136PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Cherokee district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

Error was predicated on a ruling of the district court granting appellee a new trial in an action wherein a referee had made findings in favor of appellant.

William Humble, the owner of a colliery, caused it to be insured by the German Alliance Insurance Company for $900, and the policy issued by the company provided that the loss should be paid to Joseph Humble, the appellee, who held a mortgage on the'property for $1100. The policy contained a clause to the effect that it should be void if the insured had or should procure other…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of Sedan v. ChurchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  2. Washington Mills Emery Manufacturing Co. v. Weymouth & Braintree Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  3. Clark v. President of the Manufacturers' InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  4. O'Brien v. Ohio InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Cobe v. Coughlin Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance v. SnowdenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  2. Great Southern Fire Insurance v. Burns & BillingtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  3. Akers v. Farmers Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. Kroenert v. SawyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  5. Gould v. Maine Farmers Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API