Legal Opinion

Rorick v. Chancey

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 26, 1938Published

1Opinion

The petition for rehearing filed by appellee in this case attacks, as being incorrect, the statement in the Court's opinion to the effect that: "In the case at bar the petition for removal was timely filed, on a special appearance for that sole purpose."

Appellee contends that the above statement is incorrect because the special appearance appearing in the record shows that it was not filed for the sole purpose of removing the case to the Federal Court. The appearance filed is entitled "special appearance." The exact language is "Comes now H.C. Rorick" and others, "by Alec Baker and Mitchell…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Farrell v. Forest Investment Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917
  2. Rorick v. StilwellSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. Kahn v. WeinlanderSupreme Court of Florida · 1897
  4. Standley v. ArnowSupreme Court of Florida · 1869
  5. Read v. RouschSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API