Legal Opinion

Tullis v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 7, 1997No. C7-96-687PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

Appellant Marc Tullis served a summons and complaint on an occupational therapist at the office of respondent Work Recovery Centers of Minnesota, Inc., (WRC), alleging medical malpractice. WRC sought dismissal on the grounds that the therapist was not an agent authorized impliedly by the corporation to receive service of summons, under Minn.R.Civ.P. 4.03(c). The district court dismissed the action and Tullis appeals. We reverse.

FACTS

In his complaint, Tullis alleged that on or about November 25, 1992, he underwent a physical capacity evaluation at WRC. The evaluator…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Hunt v. Nevada State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. Hardy v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Winkel v. Eden Rehabilitation Treatment Facility, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tullis v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. Jennifer L. DeCook, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. Olmsted Medical Center, Inc., Brenda J. Hanson, R.N., and Darlene M. Pratt, R.N., Appellants/Cross-Respondents, Kenneth M. Palmer, M.D., Jack F. Perrone, M.D., Kimberly McKeon, M.D., and Ashley Morrow, R.N.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  3. Jennifer L. DeCook, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. Olmsted Medical Center, Inc., Brenda J. Hanson, R.N., and Darlene M. Pratt, R.N., Appellants/Cross-Respondents, Kenneth M. Palmer, M.D., Jack F. Perrone, M.D., Kimberly McKeon, M.D., and Ashley Morrow, R.N.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API