Legal Opinion

Bunting Plastic Surgery Clinic, P.C. v. Tucker

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 6, 1992No. 2910474PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THIGPEN, Judge.

This case involves the application of our Supreme Court’s decision in Emanuel v. McGriff, 596 So.2d 578 (Ala.1992), which held the common law doctrine of necessaries to be unconstitutional.

In August 1989, the Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery Clinic sued Emmett E. Tucker, Jr., and his wife, Donna K. Tucker, for medical expenses incurred in 1988 in treating Mrs. Tucker. In January 1990, the Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery Clinic filed an amended complaint to reflect its name change to Bunting Plastic Surgery Clinic, P.C. (Bunting).

Bunting then filed a motion for summary judgment,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gossett v. Twin County Cable TV, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Emanuel v. McGriffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Mount v. Baptist Hospital of Gadsden, Inc.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. State v. BilottaCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Bunting Plastic Surgery ClinicSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. McCool v. Morgan County CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  3. Ex Parte Bunting Plastic Surgery ClinicSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Lolley v. YarboroughCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API