Russell v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Tom Glaze, Justice.
We are asked in this appeal to address an issue of first impression: in a theft-by-receiving case, should the sales tax paid on an item be included when determining the value of the item stolen? Appellant Billy Joe Russell was charged with theft by receiving; the charges stemmed from the theft of a Sears generator that had been purchased by Morris Gilmore. Gilmore testified that he bought the generator on January 18, 2004, and that it cost $499.99, plus $49.99 for an extended warranty and $39.19 in sales tax, for a total of $589.17. The- State introduced into evidence…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ayers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Cannon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Russell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Gamble v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Coley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
- Pace v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
- Mitchell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2017
- People v. Seals, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Foreman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.