Legal Opinion

Russell v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 2, 2006No. CR 06-180PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

We are asked in this appeal to address an issue of first impression: in a theft-by-receiving case, should the sales tax paid on an item be included when determining the value of the item stolen? Appellant Billy Joe Russell was charged with theft by receiving; the charges stemmed from the theft of a Sears generator that had been purchased by Morris Gilmore. Gilmore testified that he bought the generator on January 18, 2004, and that it cost $499.99, plus $49.99 for an extended warranty and $39.19 in sales tax, for a total of $589.17. The- State introduced into evidence…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ayers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Cannon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Russell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Gamble v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Coley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  2. Pace v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  3. Mitchell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2017
  4. People v. Seals, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. Foreman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API