Legal Opinion

In re Strobel

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided August 2, 1930Published

1Opinion of the Court

YOUMANS, District Judge.

The material facts are undisputed, and are stated in the certificate of the referee as follows:

“1. R. M. Thompson, who was an equal partner with bankrupt until March 13, 1929, and principally liable as such partner for the debt of Einkelstein Cloak & Suit Company, was sued by said creditor, who obtained judgment against .him for $398.39, and upon execution against him he paid the same and now files his claim against the bankrupt’s estate for the amount of said judgment.
“2. The said R. M. Thompson filed another claim for $9,792.73 against the bankrupt’s estate, based…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Prins v. American Trust CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  2. Schoeppel v. PfannensteilSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. Huckins v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  4. Swafford v. KetchumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API