Legal Opinion

Buckner v. Buckner

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1981No. 13009PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASLEY, Chief Justice.

Seymour D. Buckner filed suit against Mrs. Buckner for divorce. She filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and forum non conveniens; the trial court granted the motion. Buckner appealed. We reverse.

Over five years prior to the time Buckner filed suit in New Mexico solely for a dissolution of the marriage, the parties had been engaged in a suit for separate maintenance, alimony and child support in a New York court. Since that cause was filed Buckner has established residence in New Mexico for a sufficient time to legally petition for divorce.

We must…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Motor Inn Management, Inc. v. Irvin-Fuller Development Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Chavez v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Torres v. GambleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Hemmelgarn v. Boeing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Marchman v. NCNB Texas National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Kedy v. A.W. Chesterton Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  3. First Financial Trust Co. v. ScottNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State Ex Rel. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. FrostNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Werner v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API