Legal Opinion

Boevink v. Christiaanse

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1903No. 12,857PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: Lincoln Frost, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Hastings, C.

This is a suit in equity brought by plaintiff and appellee to establish his right to be subrogated to the ownership of a mortgage executed February 5,1887, by Abraham Christiaanse to the Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company upon 80 acres of land in Lancaster county. The original mortgage was for $700. Before its maturity the mortgagor died. At its maturity application was *257made to plaintiff for a loan with which to pay off the amount remaining due, $500. The executrix and plaintiff applied to the county judge for instructions in the matter, and were told by him and by attorney…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Home Savings Bank v. BierstadtIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Rice v. WintersNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Bohn Sash & Door Co. v. CaseNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Cumberland Building & Loan Ass'n v. SparksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  5. Fridenburg v. WilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1883

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Charmley v. CharmleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Todd's v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. Powers v. PenseWyoming Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. PersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Laffranchini v. ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API