Legal Opinion

Heyward v. Sanner

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 22, 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City (Dobler, J.) The plaintiff having failed to elect a trial by jury, the Court, upon the inquisition, assessed the damages at $12$.

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

The plaintiff below was a conductor on one of the cars of the City and Suburban Railway Company in the city of Baltimore. It was his duty, when fares were collected, to register them by a device called an “indicator,” and to account each day for the number shown by the register. It is alleged in the narr. that after having been wrongfully discharged from the service of that company, he became a *20conductor on the cars of the Lake Roland Elevated Railway Company, which also operated a line of street cars in the same city; that whilst so employed, the defendant falsely and maliciously, with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Negley v. FarrowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  2. Green v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
  3. McBee v. FultonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
  4. Garrett v. DickersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1863
  5. Long v. EakleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Millison v. Ades of Lexington, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  2. J. C. Penney Co. v. HarkerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WebbCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Miles & Stockbridge, P.C.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
  5. Sullivan v. MillerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API