Legal Opinion

Watson and Smith v. Union County

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 8, 1937No. 4-4523PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoHaney, J.

The agreed statement of facts in this case shows that the quorum court of Union county properly and regularly appropriated the sum of $1,800 to pay the salary of a Home Demonstration Agent for the county for the year 1933, at the rate of $150 per month; that appellant, Myrtle Watson, was employed by the county judge under a verbal contract (no order being made by the county court with reference thereto), to act as such agent for the year 1933 at said monthly salary; that she entered upon her duties and performed same for the whole year, acting under said agreement; that she was paid the sum…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Monroe County v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  2. Leathem & Co. v. Jackson CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  3. Rebsamen, Brown & Co. v. Van Buren CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  4. Seelig v. Phillips CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  5. Searcy County v. JordanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mears v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. Needham v. GarnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  3. Ladd v. StubblefieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  4. Jeffery, County Judge v. TrevathanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  5. Gordon v. Woodruff CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API