Legal Opinion
Harper v. Han Chang
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 30, 1999PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiffs’ cross motion for an adjourn*1012ment and. dismissing the complaint (see, Herbert v Edwards Super Food Stores-Finast Supermarkets, 253 AD2d 789; Paulino v Marchelletta, 216 AD2d 446). The determination whether to adjourn a trial “is addressed to the discretion of the trial court and should not be interfered with absent a clear abuse thereof’ (Blunt v Northern Oneida County Landfill, 145 AD2d 913). While “[ljiberality should be exercised in granting postponements or continuances…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Balogh v. H.R.B. Caterers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Herbert v. Edwards Super Food Stores-Finast Supermarkets, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Le Jeunne v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Blunt v. Northern Oneida County LandfillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Paulino v. MarchellettaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brusco v. Davis-KlagesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Stevens v. Auburn Memorial HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Pitts v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Chamberlain v. DundonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- McKenna v. ConnorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.