Legal Opinion

Dickinson v. Vail

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 20, 1918PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Bates Circuit Court. — Hon C. A. Galvird, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtEllison, P. J.

Plaintiff’s action was instituted to recover an alleged balance due on a promissory note. Tbe judgment in the trial court was for defendant.

A promissory note was given to plaintiff for four hundred dollars, signed by J. W. Trimble, Nora Trimble, J. G. Rennie, W. M. Bennington and W. H. Vail. The action was dismissed as to all except defendant Vail. On the face of the note all these parties appear to be makers, but in fact, the three named last were sureties for the two named first. After the note became due plaintiff and defendant Vail entered into the following written contract: “This…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Whitcomb v. National Exchange BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. New York, N.H. & H.R. Co. v. Reconstruction Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  2. Gannon v. BronstonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  3. McGlynn v. GranstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Manly v. . BeamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Farmer v. FarmerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API