Legal Opinion

Gilligham v. Ray

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1909No. Docket No. 96PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Muskegon; Sessions, J. Bill by Albert J. Gilligham against Carl Ray and W. S. Waterman to enjoin the exhibition of certain moving pictures. From an order overruling a demurrer to the bill, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Blair, 0. J.

Defendants appeal from an order overruling their demurrer to the complainant’s bill of complaint. The bill of complaint sets up that, under a contract with the Chicago Film Exchange, the owner and controller of “the original Nelson-Gans fight film pictures taken at Colma, Cal.,” complainant acquired the exclusive right to show said pictures on or before the 26th day of November, 1908; that complainant had made arrangements at great expense to exhibit said pictures at the Grand Opera House at Muskegon on Thursday afternoon and evening, November 26, 1908, and that no one else had a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Township of Merritt v. HarpMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Greenley v. HoveyMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Montgomery Enterprises v. Empire Theater Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Alcazar Amusement Co. v. Mudd & Colley Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. A & M Records, Inc. v. M. V. C. Distributing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  4. ATTORNEY GENERAL EX REL. OPTOMETRY BOARD OF EXAMINERS v. PetersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Records, Inc., CBS v. Distributing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API