Legal Opinion
Cedar Lumber, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided November 3, 1987No. 30-87CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
Pending before the court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. After consideration of the written submissions and for the reasons stated herein, defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted, and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied.
*548I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This action arises out of a contract for the sale of timber between Cedar Lumber, Inc. (“Cedar”) and the United States Forest Service (“Forest Service”). The parties have, over time, entered into a number of such contracts. The one at issue is known as the Upper Sardine Timber Sale. It…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Fortec Constructors v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- North Side Lumber Co. v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Alvin, Ltd. v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Dynamics Corporation of America, as Successor in Interest to International Fermont, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alaska American Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- Cedar Lumber, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Underground Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Cleek Aviation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990