Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. AT & G. CO., INC.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 6, 1976No. Docket 20459Published

1Opinion of the Court

66 Mich. App. 359 (1976)

239 N.W.2d 614

SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY

v.

A.T. & G. COMPANY, INC.

Docket No. 20459.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided January 6, 1976.

M. Glenn Grossman for plaintiff.

William R. Stackpoole for defendant.

Before: BASHARA, P.J., and J.H. GILLIS and M.F. CAVANAGH, JJ.

M.F. CAVANAGH, J.

We are called upon to determine the rights and priorities of parties to a garnishment proceeding; we must consider novel issues of Federal and state law that are not easily resolved.

On April 21, 1971, plaintiff-appellee (garnishor) was awarded a judgment of $275.89 against principal defendant…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Kokoszka v. BelfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. North Chicago Rolling Mill Co. v. St. Louis Ore & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Parsons v. KnoppSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Riggs v. SterlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API