Hoffman v. Livingston
New York Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
There is weight in all the objections. The same interlocutory motion, on the same matter, -ought not to be repeated, without the existence-of some new *212ground. The former motion, on the same point, was heard, discussed, and decided; and there would be great vexation But it is said that the if the same motion can be repeated. . . affidavits present new matter. 1 hey are intended, however, only as additional evidence of .the matter urged in support of the former motion ; nor is it usual or proper to introduce affidavits (taken, necessarily, ex parte) to aid the answer, on such a…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Fenno v. SayreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1842
- Falkinburg v. LucyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Smith v. PowerTexas Supreme Court · 1847
- Swift v. SwiftSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
- Horton v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.