Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Livingston

New York Court of Chancery

Decided September 19, 1814PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

There is weight in all the objections. The same interlocutory motion, on the same matter, -ought not to be repeated, without the existence-of some new *212ground. The former motion, on the same point, was heard, discussed, and decided; and there would be great vexation But it is said that the if the same motion can be repeated. . . affidavits present new matter. 1 hey are intended, however, only as additional evidence of .the matter urged in support of the former motion ; nor is it usual or proper to introduce affidavits (taken, necessarily, ex parte) to aid the answer, on such a…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fenno v. SayreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1842
  2. Falkinburg v. LucyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Smith v. PowerTexas Supreme Court · 1847
  4. Swift v. SwiftSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
  5. Horton v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API