Legal Opinion

People v. Lein

California Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1928No. Docket No. Crim. 3052PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

In the county of Riverside the defendant was charged by information with having intoxicating liquor unlawfully in his possession. He pleaded guilty to conviction of a similar prior offense, and pleaded not guilty to the offense charged in the information. On the trial the jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged. The trial court pronounced judgment that defendant pay a fine of $1,000 or be confined in the county jail one day for each two dollars of the fine, the total period of confinement not to ex ceed six months. The defendant appeals from the judgment.

The defendant’s first contention…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. GalliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. People v. CencevichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. De PaulaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. People v. AbairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. People v. MimmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. State v. BusackSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State Ex Rel. Enochs v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API