Legal Opinion

Jimmy v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 8, 1973No. SC 376PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Justice.

The sole issue presented is whether an indictment for selling drugs must name the vendee in the sale.

The indictment charged that the defendant “did possess, sell, furnish, or give away Lysergic Acid Diethylamide, contrary to law.” He was found guilty and sentenced to five years imprisonment in the penitentiary. The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed for the following reason:

“The indictment, as pointed out by an appropriate ground of demurrer, omits the name of the vendee. The court overruled the demurrer. This ruling was error. Pettry v. State, 47 Ala.App. 237, 252 So.2d 659.”

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Adkins v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. Duin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. Duin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  4. Pettry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  2. Jimmy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API