Legal Opinion
Jimmy v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided November 8, 1973No. SC 376PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MERRILL, Justice.
The sole issue presented is whether an indictment for selling drugs must name the vendee in the sale.
The indictment charged that the defendant “did possess, sell, furnish, or give away Lysergic Acid Diethylamide, contrary to law.” He was found guilty and sentenced to five years imprisonment in the penitentiary. The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed for the following reason:
“The indictment, as pointed out by an appropriate ground of demurrer, omits the name of the vendee. The court overruled the demurrer. This ruling was error. Pettry v. State, 47 Ala.App. 237, 252 So.2d 659.”
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Adkins v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Duin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Duin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1971
- Pettry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1971
3Cited by2 opinions
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
- Jimmy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973