Duin v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
CATES, Judge.
Selling marijuana: sentence fifteen years.
The jury found Duin guilty November 20, 1969: After adjudging him guilty the court remanded the defendant “to jail to await the sentence of the law.”
On December 12 the defendant was again before the court, this time without counsel. (R. 6) After allocutus the court sentenced the defendant to fifteen years in the penitentiary.
I
The absence of counsel at sentencing is a denial of due process and hence error. Shellnut v. State, 280 Ala. 28, 189 So.2d 590; Mempa v. Rhay, 389 U.S. 128, 88 S.Ct. 254, 19 L.Ed.2d 336; McConnell v. Rhay, 393 U.S.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- McConnell v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Borman v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- Charles T. Henderson, Jr., George Truitt Robbins and John B. Dees v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Morrow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- Duin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Haynes v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Jenkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- Pettry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.