Exchange National Bank v. Darrow

In deciding this case, the Appellate Court, speaking through Mr. Justice Wright, delivered an opinion which, with the exception of a few omissions, is as follows:

“Appellant filed its bill in equity seeking a new trial in a case tried at law, against appellee, wherein the issues were found against appellant and final judgment rendered in bar of its action upon a promissory note for $1660, bearing date November 10, 1887, alleged to have been made by James H. Jenkins in his lifetime, payable to the order of Henry Metz, due in one year after date, with eight per cent interest, which the payee…