Legal Opinion

Exchange National Bank v. Darrow

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 12, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Carroll County; the Hon. John D. Crabtree, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lacet

This was a suit based on a purported promissory note for §1,660, payable to Henry Metz, dated November 10,1887, and due in twelve months from date and drawing eight per cent interest. The note was indorsed by' the payee, Metz, to the appellant about one month after the maker’s death, and a short time before it was due by its terms. The note was presented for collection against the estate of Jenkins at the March term of the Comity Court, 1891. The claim was resisted in the County Court on the ground that it was not the note of the purported maker, the deceased, and in fact was a forgery. The…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Exchange National Bank v. DarrowIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Exchange National Bank v. DarrowAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API