Legal Opinion

State v. Kaske

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 2002No. 00-865PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

¶1 The State of Montana charged Arthur Paul Kaske with criminal possession of dangerous drugs. A jury subsequently convicted Kaske of possession, but Kaske failed to appear at the sentencing hearing. The Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County, later granted a motion for a new trial and the State filed an Amended Information, adding a charge of bail jumping. Before the new trial, the District Court denied a request by Kaske to replace bis lawyer. A jury found Kaske guilty of both possession and bail jumping. Kaske appeals the court’s denial of his request for a new lawyer and the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. GallagherMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. GallagherMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. MerrickMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. HeffnerMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. SnaricMontana Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. DethmanMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. DittonMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. EdwardsMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. MinezMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. AguadoMontana Supreme Court · 2017

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API