Legal Opinion
City and County of Denver v. Athmar Park Bldg. Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided February 4, 1963No. 20165PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutton
The judgment here for review is concerned with an ad valorem tax refund granted to the defendant in error by the district court. The parties appear in reverse order of their appearance in the trial court, where the City and County of Denver was defendant and Athmar Park Building Co. was plaintiff. They will be referred to here as the city and as Athmar.
The record discloses that Athmar purchased the property in question in 1954 and subsequently constructed a shopping center thereon. The first assessment for ad valorem taxes was made in 1955 by the city. Upon receiving the assessment Athmar…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Hilton v. FahrenkopfNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Northcutt v. BurtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
- Miller v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
- Weidenhaft v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
- United N.J.R.R., C., Co. v. State Bd., C.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Board of Assessment Appeals v. BenbrookSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Hoffman v. Colorado State Board of Assessment AppealsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Southern Cafeteria, Inc. v. Property Tax AdministratorColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
- Brown v. HansenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
- Rico Argentine Mining Co. v. Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.