Legal Opinion

Karp v. Hopalong Cassidy, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1956No. L. A. No. 23078; L. A. No. 23115PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

These are consolidated appeals from orders of the superior court sitting in the probate of the estate of Harry A. Sherman. The contestant Hopalong Cassidy, Inc., in action Number 23078 appeals from an order of August 10, 1953, vacating an order of June 22, 1953, confirming the sale *536of personal property from the estate to Hopalong individually. The contestants in action Number 23115, who claim to be heirs at law and creditors of the decedent, appeal from an order of August 24 confirming for the second time the sale of the property to Hopalong.

Harry A. Sherman died testate on September 25,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Goad v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Hennessy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Burritt v. Santa Barbara Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  4. In Re Estate of WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. People v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Estate of ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API