Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Gee
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from an award of workers’ compensation benefits to James Gee. The jury found that Gee was totally and permanently disabled from an injury that extended to and affected his body generally. Because testimony by witnesses who had not been identified in response to interrogatories was improperly admitted into evidence, we reverse the judgment and remand the cause for a new trial.
James Marcus Gee was employed by Campbell Soup as a slitter operator. While he was in the course of his employment on February 8, 1982, a metal pallet slid off a hydraulic roller…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Morrow v. H.E.B., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Amoco Production Co. v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- Smithson v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Yeldell v. Holiday Hills Retirement and Nursing Center, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Walsh v. Mullane, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gee v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- City of San Antonio v. Vela, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1988
- Farah Manufacturing Co. v. Alvarado, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1988
- City of San Antonio v. Vela, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1988