Legal Opinion

Floyd v. Jarrell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 13, 1973No. 7318SC386PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Did the trial court err in allowing defendant’s motion for directed verdict? We answer in the negative.

In 5 Strong, N. C. Index 2d, Landlord and Tenant, § 8, pp. 162-163, we find:

“The lessor is not ordinarily liable to a tenant, or the tenant’s sublessee, family, servants, or guests, for personal injuries resulting from disrepair, or patent defects, even when the lessor is under a contractual obligation in his lease to keep the premises in repair, or even if the dangerous condition had been brought to the lessor’s attention and he had agreed to repair the same, or the lessor had…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clarke v. KerchnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Clarke v. KerchnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lenz v. Ridgewood AssociatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Floyd v. JarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API