Sagarese v. Holland

At a previous term of this court relator moved for judgment on an alternative writ of mandamus and for the award of a peremptory writ. The court refused the application on the ground that the case had become merely academic. See 14 N. J. Mis. R. 652; 186 Atl. Rep. 589. Now the relator claims that he is entitled to costs (No. 240); and the respondents, having failed heretofore to enter the proper rule refusing a peremptory writ and finally determining the litigation in their favor, apply at this time for leave to enter such rule. (No. 233.)

The history of the case will be found in Sagarese v.…